Thursday, December 01, 2005

FIRE on the Daly case

FIRE, the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education, an admirable organization (co-founded by two admirable people, University of Pennsylvania history professor Alan Charles Kors and civil liberties attorney Harvey Silverglate) that exhibits true non-partisanship in defending free expression in the academy, looks at the John Daly brouhaha at Warren Community College.

A November 22 post on the FIRE blog, The Torch, sided unequivocally with Daly, concluding that his email to conservative student Rebecca Beach was clearly protected speech. Another post, on November 29, returns to the issue, examining some of the questions that came up in my own post about the case and in the comments.

FIRE program manager Robert Shibley writes:

FIRE has received e-mails from individuals who point out that Professor Daly seems hostile to the free exchange of ideas on campus. ... As one e-mail correspondent wrote, “Daly is not the victim here. He is clearly an enemy of free speech, and his message indicates that he’s willing to abuse ‘academic freedom’ to advance his own political agenda (he’s an English professor—what business does he have telling his students to boycott a political event?).... Set aside the offensiveness of his statement about soldiers killing their superiors. He is a state employee threatening to suppress free speech on a college campus. Isn’t this what FIRE is fighting against?”

... [F]rom what I have read, Daly was not threatening to use the apparatus of state power to silence an opposing viewpoint. He was merely expressing his own political convictions in a strong way, and did not appear to be making any physical threats against the student. In fact, what his e-mail (scroll to the bottom to read) actually “threatens” is that he will argue and agitate so successfully for his own political convictions that those who oppose him will be marginalized and embarrassed because so few will agree with them. ... All in all, we have seen nothing to indicate that this was not just another vehement political disagreement between politically minded adults in our society. Is it ideal for professors to address students this way? Probably not. But respect for the principle of free speech requires one to tolerate a lot of communication that is far from ideal.

Granted, Daly’s comments don’t really appear to be those of a friend of free inquiry. Yet a principled free speech advocate must be prepared to protect the speech of even those who believe that speech should be silenced and censorship widespread.

While I find Daly's email utterly reprehensible (not to mention idiotic), I think Shibley is right, and Warren College was wrong. The right answer to Daly's speech was more speech: expose his lunatic politics until he's -- well, marginalized and embarrassed. Instead, conservatives in this case have chosen to go the censorship route. Too bad, for them and for academic freedom.

Footnote: Here's an interesting question. Suppose, instead of asking for official sanctions against Daly, Rebecca Beach and her fellow conservatives had begun to agitate for students to boycott Daly's classes.

If they succeeded to the extent that not enough people would enroll in his classes to justify continuing them, the college would presumably have a right to dismiss him (as an untenured adjunct) because his employment was no longer feasible.

Thus, a student boycott would ultimately have the same effect -- albeit a delayed one -- of penalizing Daly's speech as dismissal to punish him directly for his opinions and his manner of expressing them.

What are the implications of this for academic freedom and freedom of speech?


Anonymous said...

think that a YAF-led class boycott would have been an interesting experiment; however, I don't think Daly would have forced him out, since 1) more students on that campus probably sympathize with Daly than with YAF, and 2) Daly and followers would have promptly raised a stink about "bullying and intimidation" tactics, scaring the university off from firing him. OTOH, it might have served as a warning shot across the bows of Daly and the other True Believers and made them more circumspect about their actions.

Daly should have saved the rhetoric for the campus soapboxes, not private e-mails, and certainly not in a direct teacher-to-student communique - regardless of the "unofficial" nature of the missive, it was stupid and unprofessional of Daly to send it. He left himself vulnerable to the YAF countercharge, and suffered the consequences.

thecobrasnose said...

While I can appreciate the free speech argument, couldn't the university make the case that Daly's intemperate e-mail is evidence of an unprofessional person who might not be trusted to provide a thoughtful learning environment to his students? And if so, wouldn't they be within their rights to terminate him?

Cathy Young said...

Mark, interesting points! Since we're talking about a community college, I'm not sure Daly's views would find all that much sympathy there. Though on the other hand, if a student needs to take Expository Writing 101 for her credits and Daly is the only one whose section of the course has any openings, I doubt that a lot of students would stick to principle. Still -- a boycott could have made a noticeable dent in his enrollment. And really, since Daly was bragging about organizing boycotts of YAF events and threatening to basically shame them off the campus, it would have been the height of hypocrisy for his supporters to complain about a boycott!

I do concur with you in that I don't feel that much sympathy for Daly, though I do have some free speech concerns about his case.


While I can appreciate the free speech argument, couldn't the university make the case that Daly's intemperate e-mail is evidence of an unprofessional person who might not be trusted to provide a thoughtful learning environment to his students? And if so, wouldn't they be within their rights to terminate him?

I think that for that, there have to be actual evidence that he was not providing an appropriate learning environment for his students. A person may be an ass in his or her private communications, and still behave professionally on the job.

thecobrasnose said...

I don't know that Daly's e-mail would be considered entirely private. After all, it wasn't between Daly and a friend or family member, but with a student activist who contacted him on behalf of an official campus activity. No, it isn't the same as a classroom discussion, but it was still an interaction having to do with collegiate matters.

Cathy Young said...

True, though he claims he didn't realize she was a student (her email to him came from a hotmail acount rather than a college one). Of course, as FIRE says, it's not desirable to communicate with students in this way, but I don't think it can automatically be taken as an indication of unprofessional conduct in class.

Though it wouldn't terribly surprise me if evidence did turn up that he penalized students who expressed views he considers "fascist." Now, if there was such evidence then the college definitely has a right to initiate disciplinary proceedings!

Pooh said...

Cathy, there is also the issue that he put the College's imprimatur on his missive by his signature, as "Professor".

As to the meat of your post, I see the need fore an organization like FIRE, and respect there view of this matter. As I've said previously, I come down on the other side of this issue (if barely), in that I think Daly showed a lack of professionalism. While I respect the point that such discipline could somehow 'chill' some marginal speech, that speech which is 'chilled' is much more likely than not to be ill-tempered. If someone pauses, and rewrites their points in a less threatening and more reasoned way because of this incident, well is that really a bad thing?

Cathy Young said...

Pooh -- as I read the various arguments on this case, I'm reminded of an old Jewish joke (as in, joke told among Jews, not as in "joke told by anti-Semites"). Two Jewish men in a small town have some kind of dispute and decide to take it to the town rabbi, who is reputed to be very wise. They find the rabbi at the dinner table with his wife, but he very kindly takes the time to hear them out anyway. The rabbi listens to the first man and says, "I think you are absolutely right." Then the second man speaks, the rabbi listens and says, "You know, I think you're absolutely right!" Hearing this, the wife says, "That's ridiculous -- they can't possibly both how be right!" The rabbi thinks about it, turns to his wife and says, "You know something, dear? You're absolutely right, too!"

Seriously, there are some good points being made on both sides. This is a borderline case where I think people of good will can come down on either side of the issue.

Pooh said...

You know what Cathy, you are absoultely right.

Anonymous said...

You will never find swimsuit more excellent than in Ed Hardy!
ed hardy ugg boots
ed hardy love kills slowly boots
ed hardy love kills slowly
We provide you with the sexiest swimwear at present. Wanting to be bright on beach in this
ed hardy polo shirts
ed hardy love kills slowly shoes
ed hardy wear
Abandoning traditional concepts on sexy swimwear, Ed Hardy adds tattoo upon, which is meaning
ed hardy love kills slowly shirts
ed hardy trousers
ed hardy jackets
It seems that ed hardy mens shoes was difficult to be able to let you exist out in swimwear, the
ed hardy t shirts sale
ed hardy womens t shirts
ed hardy boots
In the trunks term, the Panerai candy-flush has mainly took the Louis Vuitton Speedy purpose
ed hardy womens clothes
ed hardy womens shirts
ed hardy clothes
swimwear in an austere tone proposal combines the exclusive tailoring, Cool down, sunshine fair,
ed hardy outerwear
ed hardy womens
ed hardy womens jeans
green MOISTURE, attractive red no other elements, together with the unique thwart-buckle create
ed hardy bags
ed hardy winter boots
ed hardy t shirts
Whether it is sexy bikini, or cross-quantity g-star trunks intended to reach new heights with this
ed hardy bags
ed hardy winter boots
ed hardy t shirts
The desired redden of this type of bag, but once again the label that ed hardy and the Christian Audigier Brand Manage Louboutin at MAGIC in August 2009.
ed hardy t shirts for men
ed hardy mens jeans
ed hardy mens shoes
The total spectrum of Audigier Brand Management lifestyle brands and crop will be including ed hardy shirts,
ed hardy mens shoes
ed hardy womens hoodies
ed hardy mens tees
food ranging from ment and woment garb, accessories, footwear. Christian Audigier, SMET, Crystal Rock

Anonymous said...

Rubber. Rubber is widly used in the outsole of the athletic shoes.
cheap puma shoes
discount puma shoes
It has the advantages of durable, skipproof, flexible, elastic, extensive, stable and proper hardness.
nike shox torch
nike tn dollar
cheap nike shox
PU is a kind of macromolecule polyurethane materials which is offten used in the midsole
cheap nike shox shoes
nike shox r4
puma mens shoes
Sometimes, it is also used in the outsole of casual shoes.
PU is durable, strong hardness, upstanding flexbility and more important, it is environmentally
cheap nike max
discount nike shox
cheap puma ferrari shoes
The disadvantage is also outstanding. Strong hydroscopic property, break apart and EVA.
nike mens shoes
nike shox nz
discount nike running shoes
which is usually used in the midsole of the running shoes and casual shoes.
EVA is quite lightweight, elastic, flexible and suitable to a variety of climates.
discount nike shoes
nike shox shoes
cheap nike shoes
PHYLON. Phylon is the product of the EVA after the second processing. Just as the rubber
nike sports shoes
puma running shoes
puma sneakers
The midsole of running shoes, tennis shoes and basketball shoes in the world is made PHYLON.
nike air max tn
puma cat
puma shoes
The upstanding hardness, density, traction and extension make it favorite by the manufacture.
nike running shoes
wholesale nike shoes
nike shoes
Just as a coin has two sides, Phylon is nonrecoverable and easily shrink under high PHYLON.
nike shoes kids
nike women shoes

Anonymous said...

education is important...

Unknown said...

nice share thanks a lot :)

download free pc games
affiliate review

Susan said...

I am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this article is very nice and very informative article.I will make sure to be reading your blog more. 192.168.l.254 is mostly used by modern routers such as Linksys switches, 2Wire routers, TP-Link routers Alcatel ADSL Modems, Thompson ADSL routers, Westell ADSL Modems, 3Com routers, ADSL billions of router, SRW2023 and many more.