Monday, November 21, 2005

More on Breaking the Silence

My column on the PBS documentary Breaking the Silence: Children's Stories, which deals with abusive husbands/fathers who win custody of their children after divorce (and manages to insinuate that most men seeking custody of their children are abusers), is now up at the Boston Globe.

For more on the subject, see this post.

Update: RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting) is another website that has provided excellent analysis of Breaking the Silence.


Anonymous said...

In contested custody cases, mothers are two to four times more likely to prevail.

What's the source for this statistic, please?

I don't disagree with anything you said in your column, although possibly you could have acknowleged that the federal violence against women study you cite also found that the more serious the violence, the more men predominated as abusers.

On the whole, though, it sounds to me as if you're right, and that the documentary (which I haven't seen) is unbalanced.

On the other hand, if they had included one case in which the non-abusive parent was the father, then MRAs still would have objected because it wasn't 50-50.

Cathy Young said...

Barry, the numbers come from several studies, admittedly all going back a few years -- don't know if there are any newer numbers.

Sanford Braver's study in Arizona (in the early 1990s, I believe) found that 2/3 of mothers and 1/6 of fathers ended up with the custody arrangements they wanted.

A study in Ohio published in a journal called Family Advocate (a respected academic journal, not an advocacy publication) in 1993, by Wendy Reiboldt and Sharon Seiling, found that only 4 out of 45 contested custody cases resulted in a custody award to the father.

The largest study, by Eleanor Maccoby and Robert Mnookin (1,000 California couples divorced in the mid-1980s) found that if both parents requested sole custody when filing for divorce, the mother got sole custody 45% of the time and the father got sole custody 11% of the time (the rest being joint physical custody). When the mother wanted sole custody and the father wanted joint custody, the mother received sole custody about 2/3 of the time.

Most of these disputes were negotiated and only five couples vying for sole custody actually went to trial. Of these cases, the father won sole custody in one case and joint custody was awarded in another. (Eleanor Maccoby and Robert Mnookin, Dividing the Child, Harvard University Press 1992.

Anonymous said...

the more serious the violence, the more men predominated as abusers.

Quite the opposite is the case in child abuse, where the more serious the abuse the more likely the abuser is the mother (or her lover) than the father.

Maccoby and Mnookin is a good study, but it probably overstates success of fathers in family court since it was conducted in a very progressive jurisdiction. (Please note that in family law, "progressive" means "favorable to joint custody".)

Regarding the movie, the invocation of Joan Meier as the authority on DV and custody should be a dead giveaway. Ms. Meier is an advocate, not a researcher. It's as if somebody did a movie on fathers and custody tried to pass me off as an impartial authority with some sharp research.

vbspurs said...

Quoting an excerpt:

The filmmakers contend that their only concern was the well-being of children. Yet, if the film contributes to a climate in which fathers who seek custody are tagged as suspected abusers, it could endanger children as well.

By using the broadest of brushstrokes, by presenting one example, and making it universal, yes.

I don't think there is anyone who would like an abuser to have custody of the child.

My only plea to them is not to assume it is the father who is automatically the villain in these circumstances.

PBS should rectify this bias by presenting programs with a different point of view.

Come on, now. That's not going to happen. It's not a point-counterpoint type of entity, PBS.

Still, you could've done worse but to ask. :)


Anonymous said...

Rubber. Rubber is widly used in the outsole of the athletic shoes.
cheap puma shoes
discount puma shoes
It has the advantages of durable, skipproof, flexible, elastic, extensive, stable and proper hardness.
nike shox torch
nike tn dollar
cheap nike shox
PU is a kind of macromolecule polyurethane materials which is offten used in the midsole
cheap nike shox shoes
nike shox r4
puma mens shoes
Sometimes, it is also used in the outsole of casual shoes.
PU is durable, strong hardness, upstanding flexbility and more important, it is environmentally
cheap nike max
discount nike shox
cheap puma ferrari shoes
The disadvantage is also outstanding. Strong hydroscopic property, break apart and EVA.
nike mens shoes
nike shox nz
discount nike running shoes
which is usually used in the midsole of the running shoes and casual shoes.
EVA is quite lightweight, elastic, flexible and suitable to a variety of climates.
discount nike shoes
nike shox shoes
cheap nike shoes
PHYLON. Phylon is the product of the EVA after the second processing. Just as the rubber
nike sports shoes
puma running shoes
puma sneakers
The midsole of running shoes, tennis shoes and basketball shoes in the world is made PHYLON.
nike air max tn
puma cat
puma shoes
The upstanding hardness, density, traction and extension make it favorite by the manufacture.
nike running shoes
wholesale nike shoes
nike shoes
Just as a coin has two sides, Phylon is nonrecoverable and easily shrink under high PHYLON.
nike shoes kids
nike women shoes

Anonymous said...

You will never find swimsuit more excellent than in Ed Hardy!
ed hardy ugg boots
ed hardy love kills slowly boots
ed hardy love kills slowly
We provide you with the sexiest swimwear at present. Wanting to be bright on beach in this
ed hardy polo shirts
ed hardy love kills slowly shoes
ed hardy wear
Abandoning traditional concepts on sexy swimwear, Ed Hardy adds tattoo upon, which is meaning
ed hardy love kills slowly shirts
ed hardy trousers
ed hardy jackets
It seems that ed hardy mens shoes was difficult to be able to let you exist out in swimwear, the
ed hardy t shirts sale
ed hardy womens t shirts
ed hardy boots
In the trunks term, the Panerai candy-flush has mainly took the Louis Vuitton Speedy purpose
ed hardy womens clothes
ed hardy womens shirts
ed hardy clothes
swimwear in an austere tone proposal combines the exclusive tailoring, Cool down, sunshine fair,
ed hardy outerwear
ed hardy womens
ed hardy womens jeans
green MOISTURE, attractive red no other elements, together with the unique thwart-buckle create
ed hardy bags
ed hardy winter boots
ed hardy t shirts
Whether it is sexy bikini, or cross-quantity g-star trunks intended to reach new heights with this
ed hardy bags
ed hardy winter boots
ed hardy t shirts
The desired redden of this type of bag, but once again the label that ed hardy and the Christian Audigier Brand Manage Louboutin at MAGIC in August 2009.
ed hardy t shirts for men
ed hardy mens jeans
ed hardy mens shoes
The total spectrum of Audigier Brand Management lifestyle brands and crop will be including ed hardy shirts,
ed hardy mens shoes
ed hardy womens hoodies
ed hardy mens tees
food ranging from ment and woment garb, accessories, footwear. Christian Audigier, SMET, Crystal Rock

Unknown said...

nice share thanks a lot :)

download free pc games
affiliate review