I like Neal Boortz. And I'm generally not on the same political wavelength as MediaMatters.org. But here I am looking at a recent spat between them, and I'm thinking Boortz is wrong and MediaMatters is right.
On September 19, Boortz was involved in the following exchange on Hannity & Colmes:
COLMES: So they should not have -- are you in favor of tax cuts? You want to have more tax cuts at a time -- you want to cut the state taxes at a time when they're still struggling to pay for it and help the rich? Is that what you want to do?
SEAN HANNITY (co-host): Absolutely.
BOORTZ: As much -- as much as it disturbs the followers of Karl Marx, yes, I want the death tax over with.
COLMES: I'm a Marxist now, I see. OK.
BOORTZ: As a matter of fact, Alan, glad you mentioned that. I want it all gone, OK?
MediaMatters then ran an item titled, "Boortz referred to estate tax proponents as 'followers of Karl Marx.'"
Boortz thinks this is unfair:
Not that it really matters to Media Matters, but here we have them cold engaging in a bit of rhetorical dishonesty. I most certainly did not say that those who supported the death tax were followers of Karl Marx. What I did allude to was the fact that followers of Karl Marx would also support the death tax and that Marxists would most certainly be upset if the death tax were to be repealed. Evidently the difference between the two statements is just a bit much for the brilliant progressives at Media Matters to absorb.
Sorry, but the "rhetorical dishonesty" here is Boortz's.
His statement on the show certainly implied that the repeal of the "death tax" would be mainly upsetting to Marxists. By singling them out, Boortz was rhetorically lumping all proponents of the estate tax together with Marxists.
Let's put the shoe on the other foot. Suppose a liberal who was being interviewed on a TV show was asked by a conservative host if he believed there should be affirmative action favoring minorities in college admissions. Suppose he replied, "As much as it disturbs the Ku Klux Klan, I think we need affirmative action." Would conservatives cry foul and accuse him of equating affirmative action opponents of the Ku Klux Klan? Sure they would, and rightly so.
Fascists, Marxists, libs, racists ... can we have a little less name-calling all around, please?